Pay Heed To Maoist Concerns

Yuba Nath Lamsal

Recent remarks by Maoist Chairman Prachanda have created ripples in the Nepalese political spectrum. In an interaction with the civil society members and professionals in Kathmandu, comrade Prachanda had raised serious doubts over the holding of a free and fair election to a Constituent Assembly scheduled for November 22 this year. According to Prachanda, an environment for the elections has yet not been created, and in such a situation, the genuine verdict of the people may not be reflected in the Constituent Assembly election.

Poor security

His concerns include the poor security situation in some districts of the Terai, interference by some external forces and activities of the feudal elements against the new political process. The concerns and issues raised by the Maoist chief are genuine. The law and order situation at present is poor especially in the Terai. Some groups there have raised arms and resorted to criminal activities like intimidation, killing, abduction and extortion. As a result, many people have fled their homes for fear of their lives. The government employees, who are to conduct the elections, also do not feel safe. Hence, voters cannot freely participate in the election and give their verdict. The other issue is related to the monarchy. Although the monarchy is down, it is not out. The regressive and rightist elements under the protection and patronage of the monarchy are active in derailing the present peace and political process. The Constituent Assembly election is a historic process at making the people sovereign in the real sense and restructuring the state and ensuring inclusive democracy and a just society. The necessity of the Constituent Assembly election had been felt and demanded in 1951, and it had been agreed that elections to it would be held right after the political change then that toppled the century-old Rana family rule and established a multi-party political system. It was the monarchy that aborted the process for the Constituent Assembly election in 1951, although the then king himself had promised to hold it. Thus, historic developments have proved that the monarchy has been the main hurdle in democratic consolidation since 1951.

It has also been proved that the monarchy and the Constituent Assembly cannot go together. Nowhere in the world have the two gone hand in hand. One must be compromised for the other. And there has been a wave for republicanism, and it is almost certain that the monarchy would go if the Constituent Assembly election were held in a free and fair manner. Thus, monarchists in collusion with some external forces and fundamentalist elements are hatching a conspiracy to sabotage the process for the election with the feeble hope that the monarchy will survive. The election to the Constituent Assembly may not be possible as long as the monarchy exists in Nepal. Moreover, the monarchy is a symbol of feudalism, exploitation and discrimination, which has already lost its relevance. Since the constitution has a provision to abolish the monarchy by a two-third majority in Parliament, the eight political parties can and should declare Nepal a democratic republic from parliament to facilitate the smooth conduct of the election. The other issue comrade Prachanda has raised is related to external pressure and interference in Nepal's internal affairs. The Maoists are of the belief that some powerful nations are active to sabotage the Constituent Assembly election and the ongoing political process through which the monarchy can be saved and progressive forces in Nepal could be prevented from going to power.There is a grain of truth in his remarks. But the international community has been supportive of Nepal's peace and democratic process. Even during the struggle against the king's dictatorship, the support and co-operation of the international community played a crucial role in boosting the morale of the pro-democracy forces, which finally forced the king to bow down. For this, the Nepalese people are always grateful to their international friends. But the activities and remarks expressed by representatives of some nations are not at all compatible with the diplomatic norms and values. They have openly supported particular political parties and condemned the Maoists. Against this background, it was natural for the Maoist party to doubt the genuine outcome of the election. Attention should, therefore, be paid to the concerns raised by the Maoist chairman. The government, therefore, needs to take immediate measures to create a conducive atmosphere for the polls.

Prachanda's remarks were dubbed as a ploy to defer the Constituent Assembly election. Other political parties, including the power constituents of the eight party government, namely, the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML, have now come down heavily on the Maoist chairman's remarks. In fact, the Constituent Assembly election was the sole agenda of the CPN-Maoists until last year. Other political parties, including the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML, had been reluctant to go to the Constituent Assembly election. But they agreed on this issue as the Maoists continued to press for this demand. Thus, we cannot believe that the Maoists have abandoned the agenda of the Constituent Assembly election.Prachanda spoke the bitter truth, which has been difficult to digest by others. Former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba had also spoken on similar lines in the past regarding the possibility of holding the election in June. Deuba had also come under severe criticism from all parties, including the Maoists, for his remarks that it was not possible to hold the election in June under the then prevailing situation. But it was accepted by all later, and it was agreed to defer the election date till November.

22-point agenda

Earlier, the Maoists had unveiled their 22-point demand, in which they have expressed clear commitment to the Constituent Assembly election. Their only concerns are the basis and grounds for the elections. It would, thus, be unfair to doubt the intention of the Maoists regarding their commitment to the Constituent Assembly election as the Maoists would definitely not want to abort the process and agenda they had raised. Against this background, it would be in the interest of the nation if the political parties stopped blaming each other and worked in unison for the common goal of holding the Constituent Assembly election

Source: The Rising Nepal, August 31, 2007