Nepal's Ex-Rebels Threaten to Quit Govt

BINAJ GURUBACHARYA

KATMANDU, Nepal -- Nepal's former rebels threatened Sunday to quit an interim coalition government unless their demands were met, which include the creation of a republic and protection against attacks from rival groups.
Communist rebel leader Prachanda told reporters his faction would leave the coalition government, formed as part of a peace deal, and launch protests unless other members of the administration meet the demands.
"We will decide within a week or 10 days," said Prachanda, who goes by one name.
The communists gave up a decade-old armed revolt last year to join the peace process and became part of the Parliament and government this year.
The former rebels have threatened to walk out of the government several times in recent months, but Sunday's warning was likely to be taken more seriously as it came after a weeklong meeting in the capital, Katmandu, between local and national-level leaders of the communist movement.
Former communist activists have been attacked by rival groups in recent months. At least 28 communist supporters were killed during one attack by an ethnic minority group on a communist rally in March in southern Nepal.
The former rebels also want other members of the coalition government to reveal the location of hundreds of their militants missing during years of fighting.
The other coalition partners in Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala's government did not comment on Prachanda's threat.
The government is to hold elections for a special assembly in November that would decide on a political system for Nepal, currently a constitutional monarchy, and rewrite the constitution.

Source: The Washington Post, August 13, 2007

Poor side of you

After a lull of a few days, the Maoist-aligned Communication, Printing and Publications Workers' Union (CPPWU) has done it again — disrupt the distribution of The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post. Last time, the disruption went on for a week, and the publishers lost millions of rupees. This time, they have also obstructed the printing (Sunday's edition). All this ostensibly because the two newspapers carried Patan Appellate Court's summons to three union leaders asking them why the court should not issue a stay order against such disruptions. On Saturday night, union workers gheraoed the printing press and threatened staffers there. On Saturday morning, they seized all copies of both papers on the grounds that the editions carried news against them . On Friday evening, they had threatened editorial staffers at Annapurna Post with obstructing the distribution if the paper carried the news.The union workers have crossed reasonable limits. Now that the question of the news is over, how can they defend the continued disruption of printing or publication? Present union action at these newspapers has been over the demands of the cycle boys who deliver these papers and who are also allied with CPPWU. However, the boys are related to these newspapers only indirectly, as they are, for all legal and practical purposes, the employees of the nine distributors of these newspapers. This legal fact has made the workers' action all the more galling. They are supposed to put their demands or grievances before their management — the distributors concerned. In this, therefore, the International Media Network Nepal (Pvt) Ltd., the publisher of THT, and the News Media (Pvt) Ltd., the publisher of Annapurna Post, are not involved in any way. The union's illegal action has endangered the livelihood of 350 families directly dependent on these organisations.

CPPWU members have started a go-slow at the Kantipur Publications too, threatening stronger action. Some time ago, they had done it at Kamana Prakashan. Recently, their action led to the suspension of services of HBC FM. However, it may not mean that all of their grievances are necessarily unreasonable. This is something to be tested at the negotiating table if the disputants come with a flexible approach. What has been stressed here is the wrongness of their method. Obstruction of the publication or distribution of newspapers amounts to an assault on the independent functioning of the news media and this does not in any way promote democracy. Above all, the unionists have trampled upon the citizen's right to know. It is a universal marketing practice and also perfectly legal in Nepal to have newspapers reached to the ultimate consumers through a network of independent distributors. It becomes the duty of the government to protect the publishers faced with such illegal obstructions and threats. On their part, the Maoist leadership must become sensitive to the agreements they have signed in which they have expressed their commitment to free press, competitive politics and democracy.

Source: The Himalayan Times, August 13, 2007

State Of Impunity Must End

Narayan Upadhyay

After a pro-tracted wait, the Krishna Jung Rayamajhi Commission Report was made public through the Legislature Parliament. Completed some eight months ago, the report has now put to an end the lingering suspicion whether the recommendations made in the report would be implemented in true spirit.

The commission completed its report after undertaking gruelling investigation, interrogations, and grilling of people accused of having used excessive force, abused positions and misused state coffers in their attempt to trample the Janandolan-II. As the movement picked, the then administration used all the state machinery to an unwarranted degree to quell the popular uprising, killing about 26 people, maiming and injuring thousands.The longer-than-expected delay in bringing the report in the open had also made the government a suspect in the eyes of the people. The government drew massive flak for showing reluctance to mete out punishment to 201 indicted persons as per the recommendations of the 1148-page report. Among the indicted, 35 were the members of from the council of ministers headed by none other than the King Gyanendra, five were the regional administrators, 13 zonal administrators, 115 security personnel from the police, army and armed police forces. A cursory glance at the report makes it clear that the Rayamajhi Commission has suggested taking action against the accused under four categories in accordance with the existing civil code, civil service, military and police acts and accused should be tried for various crimes ranging from the murder of pro-democracy protestors to abuse of authority and corruption. The report has also recommended for the departmental action for few accused. The most important part of the report is that it has suggested the government to enact new laws to punish many of the accused including, vice presidents and ministers of the King led- council of ministers, army top brasses, King’s advisors and many supporters who played vital role to crush the movement.

But the report has had its share of controversies. After the presentation of the report, conflicting statements have been made from the senior members of the government. Many legislators rapped the report for not including the King as the recipient of punishment. The Home Minister said that those accused in the report had already been penalized in one way or other while many believe that the punishment meted out to the accused is just a rap on their knuckles. Even the commissioner Rayamajhi himself said that the government had failed to take action against accused as per the words and spirit of the recommendations. All these statements help arouse lots of suspicion on the part of the government which was accused of dilly-dallying in implementing the recommendations.The long reigning trepidation among the Nepali people that the recommendations conclusions made by any commission set up to investigate into some atrocities, corruption, crimes and accidents are not implemented has been justified on many occasions. Governments when they come to the helm through some revolutions or movements tend to forget or try to tone down the severity of punishments sought in the commission findings. Not long ago, ditto had happened when the people of the nation had fought to restore democracy in 1991. The then government had formed a commission, known as the Mallik Commission, to investigate and then incriminate the people involved in making atrocities against the leaders, activists and supporters of the different political parties participating in the popular people’s movement. The government that was formed just after the restoration of democracy not only failed to action against the people indicted in the Mallik report, but also allowed all of them to participate in politics and take benefits from the various public positions.

The leniency of the then government saw many of the Panchayat followers, indicted by the Mallik Commission, riding to powerful and important ministerial portfolios in later years. But with the presentation of the Rayamajhi Commission report at the Legislature Parliament, a place for the people’s representatives, the days of the state of impunity that has tarnished the Nepali politics, bureaucracy and society as a whole for long are numbered now. The government is under duress to take action against the wrong-doers in accordance with the commission report. The task for the government in taking action seems to be easier now because the government has all the support from every quarter to prosecute the accused. If the present eight-party alliance government was to augment its image, then it must aim to fulfill the people’s aspirations and restore people’s faith on it. Now the government must take a quick and positive move so that it can implement the recommendation in true democratic manner. This is necessary to spread the message among the masses that the government really cares for the rule of law and the protection of people’s human rights. In the past, the many corruption tainted leaders, bureaucrats and civil servants walked freely taking advantage of their clout over the nation’s politics, bureaucracy.

Now, as the Rayamajhi Commission report has come into the open, the eight-party government must not allow persons accused of subverting people’s love and aspiration for democracy and the violators of the human rights roam scot-free. They must be penalized as suitably as suggested in the report.

Source: The Himalayan Times, August 13, 2007

CA Polls: High Demands

Prem N. Kakkar

THE country has seen some more political developments in the past one week. An important one is making public the Rayamajhi Commission. In fact, there could be many reasons for the delay in making the report public. Now that the report and recommendations have been made public, the heat is now on. There are many who are not happy with it. But it must be agreed that this report has not suffered the same fate as the Mallick report that probed into the previous people's movement.

Sacrifices

It is appropriate that those who committed excesses during Jana Andolan II and misused authority and state funds ought to receive the punishment as dictated by the law of the land. If some laws need to be framed, the legislature parliament ought to move ahead with it. Only then will it be able to justify the people's sacrifices made during the April revolution last year.

It has also been suggested that action against those named in the report should be taken before the Constituent Assembly elections. This may be justified in the sense that the CA poll is the culminating point of the gains of Jana Andolan II for the present. That done, the people will be satisfied that their voices have been heard and they can participate in the polls freely and fearlessly to elect the constituent assembly which will have the task of drafting an all-inclusive democratic constitution.On the question of the constituent assembly election, various problems have been raised by various groups and parties. The Maoists want the declaration of a republican state before the polls while other groups have their own demands concerning representation and the voting system. The country is passing through a transitional phase, and it is only natural that such problems should arise. But they must be tackled in the best possible manner.

An armed struggle is not an answer to the problems facing the country. This was a fact realised very wisely by the Maoists. But there are some groups in the Terai that have taken up arms, and regular news of abductions and killings of innocent people are being reported. This is rather unfortunate because the sovereignty is vested in the people, and there are peaceful means to get their grievances addressed.Towards this end, the government talks team has sincerely taken up the task of holding talks with the various agitating groups. There have been some positive signals, but there is still more path to be covered. The agitating groups have their own set of demands, but resolving them is taking time, and so the talks have been lingering on. Just take the demand by a Terai group - that the legislature be dissolved. This is difficult to be fulfilled in the present context. The government talks team should do the necessary homework before it engages in talks with the various agitating groups. However, talks must continue till an amicable conclusion is reached. This is very urgent as the constituent assembly polls are just round the corner.

The deteriorating law and order situation in the country is also a problem. The government is aware of the unrest in the Terai and is trying to do the needful but has not made much headway. For this, the political parties, agitating groups and the people, in general, have to join hands. The commitment of the political leaders is of utmost importance. They should be careful as to how they express themselves to the people. Misleading comments and statements have to be avoided. Controversial statements go to create confusions among the people. Today's political leaders are experienced and seem to understand the pulse of the people, so they must avoid comments that stir up the people's negative sentiments. It is they that the people are seeing as saviours, and if they fail, it will be a misfortune for the country.ChallengesWith the focus on the CA polls, the parties have to get to the act of making headway in the direction. Concentrating themselves in the Kathmandu Valley will not be enough. It is time they spread out into the villages and the districts with the message of the CA polls. The risk factors are there, but they have to face the challenges. And in this rests the future of the country and the people.

Source: The Rising Nepal, August 10, 2007

Maoist Plenum : Unity To Continue

Vijaya Chalise

The fifth plenum of the Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (CPN-Maoist) concluded after unanimously endorsing the political paper presented by the party chairman, Prachanda. The meeting has concluded that opting for federalism and the proportional electoral system would be prerequisites for creating a congenial atmosphere for the polls. The Maoist Party now seems to have formally set the proclamation of Nepal as a republican state and the proportional system of elections as the party's preconditions for participation in the Constituent Assembly (CA) polls.

Republican demand

Deputy commander of the CPN (Maoist) Barsha Man Puna said that the party would seek consensus from the other parties and the government for declaring Nepal a republic and adopting the proportional electoral system before going to the CA polls. The Maoist leadership faced enormous pressure during its six-day long expanded meeting of the party to either play an effective role to meet the expectations of the people in the interim government or withdraw immediately. However, they decided not to pull out of the government for now. The decision to keep the eight-party coalition intact has assured the people again that the peace process would not face any hitches and the CA elections would be held.The delegates had expressed strong dissatisfaction with the government's working style, and some of them had alleged that the eight-party government had failed to address genuine demands of the Madhesis, ethnic nationalities and the oppressed. For that reason they argue that the new bases for the coalition to continue would be the declaration of a republic and proportional electoral system, as Prachanda's paper states, the CA poll cannot be held as long as the monarchy exists. This may call for another revision in the interim constitution.

In the political agreement reached between the Seven Party Alliance and the CPN (Maoist) on November 8, the Maoists had taken a soft position as there were many internal and external forces barring them from joining the interim government. Therefore, the UML was the only party sticking to the proportional electoral system at that time. Some political parties, namely the Nepali Congress, however, differ on whether the electoral system can be changed. The CA elections are barely 103 days away. The Maoist's fifth expanded meeting, however, endorsed the political proposal including the proclamation of a republic and a fully proportional electoral system for the constituent election polls. The document presented by Party Chairman Prachanda has underlined the need to create a congenial environment for the constituent assembly elections. Observers, too, say that the new bases for eight-party unity might be based on a broader republican front for the CA election. Madhav Nepal, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist- Leninist) has been emphasising an eight-party republican front to keep the eight-party unity intact. The Maoists favour a front among the political forces that want a republican set-up in the country. Likewise, Maoist leaders have proposed to the government taking a joint eight-party political campaign to the Terai as there is a possibility of some Madhesi groups disrupting the constituent assembly polls.However, Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala has reportedly told the Maoist leaders that there can be no preconditions for the polls. However, he has not yet made any reaction regarding the Maoist's preconditions. Likewise Minister for Peace and Reconstruction Ram Chandra Poudel has expressed his displeasure, saying how a party that was fighting for a constituent assembly, even when others were sticking to a monarchial parliamentary system, could be shying away from the CA polls, setting preconditions for the polls.

Thus, the bone of contention seems to be the question of whether the country should be declared a republic before the polls or to leave it to be decided in the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly after the polls. The Nepali Congress (NC) wants the fate of the monarchy to be decided by the first meeting of the constituent assembly; however, other major political parties, including the UML and Maoists, want a republican set-up to be declared before the November polls. The CPN (UML) has floated a mid-way solution as well - holding a referendum to decide the place of the monarchy in the future political scenario of Nepal. However, UML leaders say that their party is open to both options backed by the NC and NCP (Maoist). UML General Secretary Nepal has repeatedly said that the political parties should not hesitate to go for a referendum. Likewise, the NCP Maoist's argument that the Constituent Assembly (CA) election could not be held unless Nepal was declared a republic cannot be ignored. Not only the Maoists but civil society activists, too, believe that declaring Nepal a republic is essential if the constituent assembly election is to take place. Therefore, it would be wise to build consensus among the major political forces to guarantee and institutionalise the achievements made after the April movement. The objectives of the Jana Andolan would remain incomplete until the constituent assembly elections were held in the country. The government is lagging behind in showing its political commitment empowered by the Jana Andolan. It is true that once the leaders reach high places, they usually forget the ground reality that it was the people who catapulted them to power.Collective approachThe need of the hour is for all the political forces and the civil society to create a congenial environment for the constituent assembly polls, as the constituent assembly is the only means to settle the contentious voices raised from different corners. Obviously, the main hurdle in holding the polls seems to be the Terai issue, and a collective approach is the only way out. The 20-point agreement reached recently between the government and the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) is a welcome sign. In the same vein, the Terai issues could be solved once and for all, helping to create a congenial environment for the election.

Source: The Rising Nepal, August 10, 2007