A Much Maligned Plan

King Gyanendra's birthday celebration plan said to be organized by his adherents and conformists has drawn flak from different quarters. Soon after the envoys from the European Union disclosed that they would not attend the King's so called birthday celebration event, the political parties, professional groups and civil society organizations have come down heavily upon it. The student wings of the political parties organized protest rallies, the other day, and asked the government through a written note to ban the so called plan as this was aimed at hatching conspiracy against the election to the constituent assembly. Moreover, political party leaders speaking at a function, the other day, pressed on the government to prohibit the King from organizing the so called show in defiance of the national law and democratic values as allowing this event would amount to acquiescing into autocracy and feudalism.

The wrath demonstrated and the anger expressed against the King and his birthday celebration plan indicates that the monarchy in Nepal has been disputed as an institution . The Interim Constitution has not left any room for the King to exercise authority and seek any role. It would not be legal from his part to overstep the boundaries set by the basic law of the land. The position of the King, according to the constitution, is suspended and deactivated . As the prime minister is enjoined with power both of the head of the state and the government, the position of the monarchy is under severe scrutiny. The first meeting of the constituent assembly will discuss and decide about the fate of monarchy in Nepal, according to the Interim Constitution. What is crucial for Nepal right now is to create a congenial atmosphere for conducting the polls to the constituent assembly so that the delicate political and social issues were addressed and tackled properly . No forces in the country should seek to create controversies and disturb the situation. The King should refrain himself from nursing any ambition and abide by the law of the land as no institutions in the democratic Nepal is above the law. Any attempt to transgress the limits of the rule of law and democracy would be resisted by the people.

Source: The Rising Nepal, July 9, 2007

Cater To Rural Areas

Following the announcement of the date for elections to the constituent assembly, debate on restructuring of the state has gathered speed and momentum. Colloquiums and symposiums have been organized to elicit opinions on issues involved on the subject and clarify how different approaches and perspectives on state restructuring relate and contradict each other. The forums organized to promote discussions on the issues relevant to state restructuring are very important because it is only through these type of interactions and dialogues that the different views clash and find way out to arrive at convergence and consensus. The subject of state restructuring is connected to the question of election to the constituent assembly . Moreover, it is a very critical subject for which the Nepalese people should have their free and meaningful participation . In order that the Nepalese people have sufficient space to contribute to discussions on the subject, forums should be created at different levels from the centre down to the local level. The making of the constitution through popularly elected the constituent assembly is premised upon the notion that the ordinary people participate in the process and endorse the provisions enshrined in the basic law of the land.

However, when it is found that many forums and discussions are concentrated in the accessible and urban areas of the country, very limited opportunities exist for ordinary people to vent and express their views and opinions. As has been emphasized time and again, the constituent assembly has been a much vaunted methodology and process for making the constitution by means of an unhindered and unchecked participation of the people. But, unless people are empowered to intervene and provide inputs in the process and substance of the constitution making popular participation and endorsement would be utterly lacking . Moreover, the question of state restructuring is a theme for which all Nepalese should exercise their agency to shape and define the elements of the new Nepali state. For this to happen and gain new thrust and dimension, it is necessary that the debates and discussion that are limited to the cities and some urban areas of the country be allowed to reach out to the rural areas of the country.

Source: The Rising Nepal, July 9, 2007

Colours To Cure?

P. Gopakumar

THE use of colour as a therapy is nothing new to the modern world. However, its application and awareness are limited. The common belief is that it is the psychiatrists who use colours largely for a cure. Let's take a peep into how colours and light offer a cure.

Negative force

Light is the mask of the creator. All life on earth depends on light from the sun, a source of life and energy. Colour is nothing more than the different qualities of light. Light is the masculine or positive force in nature; colour is the feminine of negative force.

When we take away the motion of light or colour, we have no awareness of the appearance of matter. We receive all knowledge of the universe through these electro-magnetic radiations. White light contains the energies of all elements and chemicals found in the sun. The white light of the sun is absorbed from the atmosphere by the physical body and is split into component colour energies, which in turn flow to different parts of the body so that we can see them. Light is a force which stimulates growth. Every living thing depends upon it to build and maintain its form. Light brings about chemical changes in nature. By changing the qualities of light, we can also bring about chemical changes in the body. Therefore, light, whose source is solar energy, is one of nature's healing forces.

In 1665, Sir Isaac Newton focused sunlight through a prism and found the presence of the seven basic colours. The human body is also a prism that reflects this white light. Colour therapy is the science of the use of different colours to change or maintain vibrations of the body to the frequency, which signifies good health and harmony. Healing by means of colours was the first type of therapy used by humans. It is nature's own method of keeping the body in balance with the rhythms of life. Colour expresses the way we think. Our emotions and actions affect the electro-magnetic field, which surrounds us and is reflected in our aura. Colour can help restore health when a blockage or imbalance of this energy has resulted in disease.

The use of colour can help to restore vitality to the etheric body through the projection of specific colour rays, which are then absorbed by the chakra centres. The pituitary gland transforms these colours into revitalising energies to rebuild the centres that are lacking energy. Colour healing shows us how to make light work for us. The use of colour is one of the many natural tools available to help us walk in balance with the universe. Life is colour, and each organ has specific colour. Each colour has intelligence, and works selectively. Colour is vibratory energy that can activate a particular organ, gland and system in the body. The application of the correct frequency on the electro-magnetic force field will change the altered function of the body and help return it to its original patterns. It is this energy which is the result of applying colour that is important in the healing process. This method of healing will create harmony and balance in the mind and in the body. Colour therapy is very effective because it helps to maintain this balance.

Colour healing is not only a physical but also a spiritual force, and, thus, forms a link between our physical bodies and the finer forces, or vibration, of the higher levels of consciousness, or spiritual growth. Colour is the bridge between our inner and outer bodies. The vibrations of colour are energy of the life force itself and are here to aid us in our growth and progress towards the oneness, which is our ultimate purpose. The more intimate our colour experiences become, the more attuned we will become with the universe.We have a quota of ultra-violet light most of us do not fulfil because so many modern products cut out that portion of the spectrum and because we do not spend enough time out of doors. We can increase our exposure to the full spectrum of light by simply being out in the sun more. Light automatically replaces darkness.

Warm colours increase activity and circulation and stimulate function. Red, orange and yellow are warm colours. A cool colour decreases activity and circulation. It will retard the function. A toning colour helps to promote the function. Blue, indigo and violet are the cool colours. Green colour is the toning colour, which has a self-regulating feature. Blue, indigo and violet are acid rays. Red, orange and yellow are alkaline rays. Green is in the category of a neutral ray.

Balancing actions

Colour represents chemical potencies in higher octaves of vibration. There is a particular colour that will stimulate each of the organ systems in the body. By knowing the action of the different colours upon the different organ systems, the application of the correct colour will help to balance the actions of any system that has gone out of balance in its function or condition.

Source: The Rising Nepal, July 9, 2007

Communist Parties In Nepal : A Different Breed Altogether

Ritu Raj Subedi

A section of the people, especially of the right leaning, strongly believe that the communist forces will dictate terms to the democratic parties and rule the country after sidelining the king and pro-palace elements. They have blown up the 'scarecrow' of communism out of proportion in a way that it sometimes sways those who are standing at the borderline between the monarchy and republicanism. Citing the overwhelming number of Left supporters across the country, they warn the democrats that the communists are riding on the back of Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala only to subdue him and his followers in the long run.

Pro-democracy elements

It is true that the communists have outnumbered the people of their rival camps, going by the ballot papers cast in the general elections in 2048 BS. However, Nepalese communists are not orthodox Marxists and cannot be totalitarian even if they reach power. Unlike those communist parties that captured power and established one-party dictatorship through class struggle and violent means of revolution as in the former Soviet Union, China and other parts of the world, Nepal's communist parties bear a different historical background.

They were born in the course of fighting dictatorships - be it the Rana oligarchy or the partyless Panchayat system. In Europe and elsewhere, democracy was reinstated when one-party communist rule collapsed, but in Nepal, the popularity of communism grew dramatically when the dictatorship of the king broke down. Nepalese communists have been an integral part of the country's democratic movements since their inception.Here I want to present one contrasting example related to my own experience about communism. During my stay in Seoul some months ago, I met some journalists from Eastern Europe, once satellite states of the former USSR. We were participants of the same programme. When I asked them to share their experiences about the Red reign, they had bitter feelings about it.

Ms. Maria, a veteran journalist and a pro-democracy fighter from Poland, appeared to be highly critical of the communist regime. She had spent decades of her life underground fighting the one-party communist rule. "What would you like to suggest the Nepalese, many of whom are under the influence of communism and likely to see a Red government?" I asked. She compared the people in communist rule to a person who has fallen down from a tall building. "How can I suggest you to jump from a building and break your hand and legs?" she said. She said that the people in Poland had no alternative other than to live a difficult life under communist rule. When I said that Nepali communists had struggled against various dictatorships to restore multi-party democracy, she couldn't believe my statement.

Maria and I represent different contexts. In her country, communism was imposed from outside and the people had to fight against it for democracy. In my country, communists waged relentless battles against dictatorships. As communism fell like a house of playing cards in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, the jolt too reverberated in Nepal and it served as an inspiration in ushering an era of democracy. There in Poland communists were villains in people's eyes. Here in Nepal, communists were heroes in the public's eyes. What a pleasant contrast?In 1950 when late Puspalal Shrestha founded the Nepal Communist Party and called on the Nepali Congress (NC) to wage a joint struggle against Rana rule, his request went unnoticed because of the insignificant influence of the communists in Nepalese society. He continued to voice for the creation of a joint front of democrats and communists after King Mahendra hijacked democracy and established the Panchayat system. But B. P. Koirala refused to join hands with the communists only to lengthen the age of the autocratic regime.

In 1990, Ganesh Man Singh heeded the call of late Puspalal and led a peaceful revolution jointly participated in by Nepali communist parties and the NC. He became a hero of Nepali politics, as he was an acceptable figure for the two opposing political parties. Even during the April uprising last year, the communists - radical and the moderate - and democrats jointly came to the streets against the dictatorship of king Gyanendra, resulting in the restoration of lokatantra and the comprehensive peace agreement. The April movement became successful after G. P. Koirala agreed to lead a bunch of Nepali Left groups to deal a blow to the kingship, which was a departure from the policy of senior Koirala, who rather wanted to collaborate with the monarch. One of the basic trends of the Nepalese communist movement is that major communist parties have into existence as a radical outfit and gradually turned into a centrist or moderate political force. This applies to major communist parties - the CPN-UM and the Maoist. However, one might question regarding the rise of the CPN-Maoist that orchestrated a guerilla warfare against none other than the parliamentary forces in the mid-1990's to become a major player in politics.

But going by the Maoist history ever since they waged the People's War, one can find a metamorphosis in their positions. In the beginning, it called for establishing a proletarian state through a class struggle in Nepal. As the Maoist leadership realised the limitations of waging a war and Nepal's typical geo-political situation, it continued to adjust their policies and became more pragmatic in pursuing their goals. They have now accepted competitive politics with all the tenets of bourgeois democracy. They say they will eventually establish full-fledged democracy that fits Nepali soil. Unlike the NC and the UML, they have brought to the fore burning issues such as the rights of the ethnic groups, dalits, women, Madhesis and backward communities, which have been neglected till now. It is the Maoists who catapulted the idea of the constituent assembly polls in the political circle, which subsequently became the agenda of virtually all the major parties. There are good and bad aspects of the Maoist insurgency, but it would not be an exaggeration to say that the country is now following their agenda. Their desire to be a reliable democratic force should not be undermined.

Threat of communism

It will be a futile exercise for the conservatives or pro-palace elements to push the NC into the rightist camp by showing the threat of communism. In fact, not only the communist parties but no single political force can rule the country like a dictator given Nepal's complicate power structures, people's growing democratic awareness and its economic and political dependency on foreign powers. However, the Maoists must lessen their 'ultra-Left' or militant behaviour to take those democratic forces into confidence for its bid to establish a democratic republic in Nepal.

Source: The Rising Nepal, July 9, 2007

UML policies

The communist parties in Nepal have a glorious history of splitting for interesting reasons. They are so sensitive that they form a splinter group on the differences of opinion about Russia, China or Peru's domestic policies. So when the UML central committee is reviewing its past policies and future strategies for 14 days, the anxiety about their integrity is not invalid, especially when the issues are as sensitive as perception about the Maoists and unity among the eight political parties during the CA elections. Powerful general secretary Madhav Kumar Nepal's opinion that the Maoists should be treated as extreme leftists has been vehemently opposed by other two senior leaders Jhalanath Khanal and Bamdev Gautam. The duo is of the view that in the context when the Maoists have joined the mainstream politics they do not remain extreme left. The Post seconds Nepal's idea. Until and unless the Maoists start behaving responsibly, they should be considered as extreme left, and behaved accordingly. If we go by Khanal's and Gautam's version, we will end up losing democracy.

Maybe Khanal is right in criticizing the leadership for its incompetence in the past. However, he is contradicting himself. At one point, he is demanding that the Maoists be considered more flexible and not as extreme left. On the other, he is alleging the leadership for being too flexible to negotiate for power. Gautam has gone too extreme. So, his protest holds no water. No wonder many UML cadres consider Gautam closer to the Maoists than UML. However, Nepal is also not completely right when he says that UML should coordinate closely with all the eight parties for the CA elections. In fact, his strategy should be limited to the democratic parties only. After all, UML's main rival is the CPN (Maoist), going along would be suicidal for UML in particular and democratic polity in general.

The problem with UML has been its inability to assess its own power and influence. As such, its leaders have always been grumbling about being marginalized from the government, parliament and all. This party also seems confused about who their real cadres are: extreme leftists or liberal socialists? The fact is that this party won't lose its vote bank of around 30 percent if it continues to be left to center party. This party has the potential to protect democracy and can counter Maoist extremisms. The only problem is that it has failed to groom a new leader. If Nepal wants to be remembered as a successful general secretary of the party, he has to groom new leaders from the pool of promising young cadres. The future for UML lies in becoming a socialist party and not in going back to extreme left.

Source: The Kathmandu Post, July 8, 2007