Subscribe to nepal-democracy |
Visit this group |
Thursday, 5 July 2007
Govt unveils policies, programmes : CA election high on agenda
Hinting that the king's days are numbered, the octogenarian leader told lawmakers that an event comes only once in an era and Nepal is going to witness that event soon. In his indirect reference to the monarch leaving the country Koirala said, "As Mahatma Gandhi said the British rulers will help Indian independence movement by feet, we are also coming close to something similar."
Koirala urged lawmakers not to expect too much from the upcoming budget. "It's rainy season, dashain festival will follow soon and election will be next, so there is no time for budget implementation but the supplementary budget to be presented later this year will offer something good to the people."
The prime minister also called upon lawmakers to be ready for drastic changes in the current socio-economic set up. "Only after socio-economic change can we feel the real revolution."
After finishing his remarks, Koirala asked his deputy in the cabinet, Peace and Reconstruction Minister Ram Chandra Poudel to read out the policy and programs of the government.
The policy document said the eight-party coalition government would take all major decisions through consensus and tackle the challenges collectively.
It said the government will give priority to dialogue as a means to settle all regional, ethnic and other social conflicts in order to create a peaceful atmosphere for polls. The government policy, however, warned of strong action to control violent and criminal activities. The policy document has also promised to enact legal provision to keep highways free from any kind of strike.
Referring to some violent activities continuing in the terai despite the government's earnest efforts to resolve the problems amicably, the document said, "Such violent criminal activities shall not be tolerated and those responsible shall be dealt with through stern action."
The government has promised to set up State Restructuring Commission as soon as possible and a separate taskforce for necessary homework for proportional share of all ethnic groups, women, madhesis, dalits and other backward sections in the state agencies.
The government also said it would implement the concept of special economic zones, revise foreign investment policy and take initiatives for setting up industrial security force to ensure safety of industrial investment and to promote export.
The policy paper also stated that the government would initiate the process of nationalizing late king Birendra's family assets and parks and reserves controlled by the Royal Palace.
Program & policy highlights
Security top priority
State restructuring commission to be formed
Taskforce for proportional share in state organs to all disadvantaged groups
Legal provisions to free movement on highways
Local bodies to be run through political consensus
Salary increment pledged for govt employees
Democratization of army and proper management of PLA cantonments
Posted by Pinto at 13:20 0 comments
Labels: Government, Politics
Security Arrangement
The tensions in Madhesh and other parts of the country have presented difficulties in terms of maintaining law and order for peace and harmony. The worrying part has been the indiscriminate killings and kidnappings carried out in random in the terai as a result of which the situation has become more abnormal and unusual. The economic activities in the terai have been disturbed, and the business community is facing threats and intimidation. The senseless resort to strikes and vandalism of property has created a difficult situation which might have negative repercussions in the process of holding the polls to a constituent assembly. As the government has decided to deal with the unrest in the Terai with a firm hand, the situation is expected to come under control and become normal in the days to come. Against this backdrop, it is necessary for the political parties and civil society organisations to cooperate with the government to handle the law and order situation in the Terai. It should be understood that if the situation is allowed to worsen further, it would be difficult to build a conducive environment for the polls to the constituent assembly.
Posted by Pinto at 13:19 0 comments
Labels: Internal Security
A Historic Responsibility
Posted by Pinto at 13:18 0 comments
Labels: Government, Politics
Why Institutional Reforms Count
Posted by Pinto at 13:16 0 comments
Labels: Development, Economy
Labour Accord
Posted by Pinto at 13:14 0 comments
Labels: Foreign Policy, Human Rights
Priorities For The Upcoming Budget
Posted by Pinto at 13:12 0 comments
Labels: Development, Economy
Unspoken Voices
The silent majority does not come to the streets, does not chant slogans or take up arms to have their demands fulfilled. They just remain silent though they are in the majority. Political groups, hooligans and warlords claim to represent them, but the silent majority is usually unheard of, exploited and misrepresented. This is what is happening in the ever-complicated political scene of Nepal. There is a visible difference between what the people actually want and what the various political groups are demanding and the strategies they are applying to get their demands met.
Posted by Pinto at 12:23 0 comments
Labels: Governance, Inclusive Politics, Politics
Action, action
Posted by Pinto at 12:19 0 comments
Labels: Development, Government
Federal structure: Administrative units on ethnic basis
Jawaharlal Nehru University professor S D Muni needs no introduction for Nepali intellectuals and politicians because of his long association with political developments in Nepal. Muni is a well-wisher of Nepal and an ardent believer in people’s power and democracy. He believes in the special nature of ties between Nepal and India. For these reasons his observations on current Nepali politics merit serious attention.
During his recent Nepal visit, Muni suggested that the Tarai problem be given due priority to prevent the disintegration of Nepal. The people of Tarai have been raising their voice against their marginalisation since the advent of democracy in 1950. In spite of Tarai’s contribution to Nepali economy, the state has not treated them in a fair manner. Just as a token of gesture some people from Tarai have been picked for high-level posts but not as a matter of their rights. This has been resented by the people of Tarai and particularly after the success of Jana Andolan II, and consciousness of Tarai people has increased manifold.The commitment made by the eight party alliance to restructure the state on a federal basis has been widely welcomed but the question of the basis of the formation of the new administrative units under a federal structure is yet to be answered. At the same time, the question of representation in the Constituent Assembly and future parliament remains a sensitive issue.
While there is a consensus among civil society members that the country’s future administrative units have to be decided, as far as possible, on ethnic and linguistic basis, the political leaders are still creating confusion about the issue. Even the chief government negotiator has publicly denounced formation of future administrative units on the basis of ethnicity and language. This not only diminishes the credibility of the negotiator but also raises severe doubts about government’s intention.The Tarai belt has four prominent language groups — Maithili, Bhojpuri, Awadhi and Tharu, with Hindi as their lingua franca. Now, it has to be agreed that only the people of Tarai have the right to opt for either a single Tarai unit as a new administrative entity or four units based on language.
Similarly the question of administrative units in the hills and mountains has to be left to the wishes of the people inhabiting those regions. Although most of the mountainous districts have mixed populations, a particular ethnic community makes for the dominant part of a particular district. Naturally these ethnic communities would prefer creation of administrative units on the basis of the prominence of a particular ethnic community although the rights and privileges of other minority groups would have to be protected too. But to say that since there is no majority of any ethnic community in any district there is no need for units on ethnic basis is like trying to sweep the problem under the carpet.The fact that culture grows out of a particular language. For the protection of a culture the language has to be protected is a universal truth. It has to be accepted that new administrative units will use their own language and common link language to facilitate the participation of commonfolk in socio-political activities and promotion of their culture. The right to protect one’s identity must be recognised as a fundamental right of the people. Either those opposed to formation of new administrative units have to submit a viable alternative or they should accede to the demands of the Tarai people.
If the government adopts a policy of suppression of the Tarai agitation through force, such measures will boomerang by helping the extremists who want to see the country disintegrate. The same armed forces that assured the King they would be able to quell the Maoist rebellion in six months might try to persuade the present regime that the Tarai agitation could be thwarted by martial means as well. The politicians need to keep this in mind and must open up the vista for mutual understanding.As long as the government does not show its readiness to create new administrative units on the basis of ethnicity and language and discuss the merits of proportional representation, no meaningful discussions can take place with the dissenters and the question of free and fair CA polls will remain in limbo.
For their part, the ministers must learn to hold their tongue on controversial matters which can only be solved through dialogue. They also need to show their readiness to respond to the demands of the people of Tarai, indigenous groups and ethnic communities, dalits and women. The age of imposition of one’s idea on others has passed. The new awareness among people of their legitimate rights and privileges must be respected. There is no alternative to dialogue and discussion. Use of force is undemocratic and will create bigger problems. Recognition of the sovereign right of people is the only way out of the present crisis.Upadhyay is ex-foreign minister
Source: The Himalayan Times, July 5, 2007
Posted by Pinto at 12:15 0 comments
Labels: Democracy, Inclusive Politics